Blue eyes are most common in Northern Europe and Central Europe and to a lesser degree in Southern Europe (Spain and Portugal are best examples, where 1-49% of the people are blue-eyed, through migration of Northern European and Central European settlers) and southern Central Asia; Afghanistan and Pakistan are a notable example.[30] They are also found in parts of North Africa,[31] West Asia, and South Asia,[32] in particular the northern areas of India, largely Kashmir. Pakistan and Iran also have a considerable population of blue eyed people.

A 2002 study found that the prevalence of blue eye color among Caucasians in the United States to be 33.8 percent for those born from 1936 through 1951 compared with 57.4 percent for those born from 1899 through 1905.[10] Blue eyes have become increasingly rare among American children, with only one out of every six or 16.6%, which is 49.8 million out of 300 million (22.4% of white Americans) of the total United States population having blue eyes.[33][34] The plunge in the past few decades has taken place at a remarkable rate. A century ago, 80 percent of people married within their ethnic group. Blue eyes were routinely passed down, especially among people of Western and Northern European ancestry.[33][34][35]

However,after World War2 they deliberately set out on a course the opposite to what Hitler preached, the result of which we are seeing today,

I believe the same lies in store for Ulster. The procedure seeems to be that when conflict arises the attitude of America especially is that this must be never allowed to happen again. We must do anything, and pull any move to see that it doesn't. After our conflict (albeit on a smaller scale) the same measures will be used to bring Ulster and Eire together as was used to the same end in Europe.

An Australian Prime Minster a few years back expressed his views about a break with Britain when he said that Britain had turned their back on us when they went into Europe. Why should we not now do the same? He may have a point.

Just as an aside. The Daily Express was the only newspaper which stood against entry to the then Common Market.

The description given to an ideal English girl was 'The English Rose' which was blond hair,blue eyes,rosy,cheeks. I think they even had an 'English Rose' contest. Ah,but all long gone now.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20061022/news_1c22blue.html

America would probably cite its own society which is a 'dolly-mixture' one and say if we can do it,so can you. Their influence is everwhere and has been for a long time now. In 'The British Empire' by Niall Ferguson if I remember correctly, he says that America actually told Britain 'its time for you to move over now cause we're taking over'. In the Dimbely series on TV he said that America's strategy was 'we don't want to run a country...just own it'. Though multinational companies etc.

When Enoch Powell first said that America was involved in the Ulster situation I remember thinking 'I can't see that, Britain is still Great Britain and each country controls its own system and area. How wrong I was. The mighty dollar rules. Just to own a country is the policy and let the locals supposedly run it.