Friday, 2025-01-31, 4:59 PM
Welcome, Guest
[ New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
Forum moderator: RSAUB  
Formation of 'civil rights' in Ulster
CulzieDate: Saturday, 2009-11-28, 2:33 PM | Message # 1
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
The formation of the civil rights movement has often been presented as a spontaneous uprising. However,many people knew different. Civil rights was a means to an end,there was another agenda. That other agenda was the border between Ulster and Eire and its removal. The ira launched a campaign in the later 1950s which lasted until 1962. to remove the border. It was a complete failure. So in any future campaign a new strategty would have to be used. The protest movement which started thoughout the Western World in the middle/late 1960s was a golden opportunity. Repulican ira men had waited for this chance and it wasn't to be missed.....it wasn't. Consquently when the 'civil rights' in Ulster took off, copying the MLK civil rights movement in America the ira were in right away.

There are still people who say that the ira were not involved,but they are not facing up to the fact that they were involved.

BILLY McMILLEN

Billy McMillen (also known as Billy Mac Maoláin, Liam McMillen and Liam Mac Maoláin) was an Irish republican activist and an officer of the Official Irish Republican Army (OIRA). He was killed in 1975, in a feud with the Irish National Liberation Army, which had broken away from the OIRA.

McMillen was born in Belfast in 1927 and joined the IRA at age 16 in 1943. During the IRA's Border Campaign (1956-62), he was interned and held in Crumlin Road jail. In 1964, he ran in the British general election as an Independent Republican candidate.

In 1967, McMillen was involved in the formation of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association, being a member of a three-man committee which drew up the Association's constitution.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
CulzieDate: Friday, 2009-12-04, 9:37 PM | Message # 2
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
One of the best tactics of nationalists/republicans was to create a situation and then complain about it. They refused to take their seats at Westminster and then proceeded to complain about their voice not being heard. They made complaints too about Unionist controlled discrimination,but did the same in the areas they controlled. Newry being one of these areas....

In Stormont the Nationalist Party, the largest parliamentary opposition group, bluntly refused to accept the title of Her Majesty's Official Opposition. They were opposed to the Government, but not officially, and in a consciously unofficial manner they complained about discrimination against Catholics and simultaneously practiced discrimination against Protestants in some Nationalist-controlled councils.

For electoral purposes the Republicans usually contested Westminster elections, always on an abstentionist ticket. The Nationalists settled for attendance at both Stormont and at Westminster.

From 'We Shall Overcome' 1978. A history of the N.I. Civil Rights Movement.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
CulzieDate: Friday, 2009-12-04, 9:51 PM | Message # 3
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
FIRST MOVES
The first move in what was eventually to emerge as NICRA came from the Wolfe Tone Society. The Society recognised the growing awareness of the need for a broad organisation to channel the demands for democratic reform and to this end they organised a meeting of all Wolfe Tone Societies in Maghera in August, 1966.
The outcome was a decision to hold a public meeting to highlight the issue of civil rights in Northern Ireland. This was held in the War Memorial Building in Belfast in November, 1966, and its attendance was drawn from all sectors of libertarianism in Northern Ireland, the Chairman being John D. Stewart.
The two main speakers were Ciaran Mac An Ali, who spoke on "Civil Liberty - Ireland Today" and Kadar Asmal, who spoke on "Human Rights, International Perspective".
The support for this public meeting prompted the Belfast Wolfe Tone Society - effectively Fred Heatley and Jack Bennett - to hold another broad meeting with a view to setting up a formal organisation which could be devoted to unifying the struggle for civil rights.

In all there was over one hundred people present and a 13 man committee was elected to draw up a draft constitution and a programme of campaign for submission to a later meeting.
The 13 man steering committee later elected the following officers:

Chairman: Noel Harris [DATA]
Vice Chairman: Conn McCluskey [CSJ]
Secretary: Derek O'Brien Peters [Communist Party]
Treasurer: Fred Heatley [Wolfe Tone Society]
P.R.O.: Jack Bennett [Wolfe Tone Society]
Other members of the committee were:
Betty Sinclair [Belfast Trades Council]
Billy McMillen [Republican Clubs]
John Quinn [Liberal Party]
Michael Dolley [National Democratic Party]
Joe Sherry [Republican Labour Party]
Jim Andrews [Ardoyne Tenants Association]
Paddy Devlin [Northern Ireland Labour Party]
Tony McGettigan [no affiliation]
NICRA'S OFFICIAL BIRTH
While the Queen's students highlighted the need for the right to freedom of political association, NICRA held its meeting to ratify the constitution on April 9th 1967. It was on this date that NICRA officially came into existence. There were some changes in the executive council with Ken Banks [DATA], Kevin Agnew [Republican] and Terence A. O'Brien [Derry, no affiliation] replacing Andrews, McMillen and McGettigan.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
CulzieDate: Sunday, 2009-12-13, 10:29 PM | Message # 4
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
This is an excerpt from a book We Shall Overcome,telling their story. While almost everything is blamed on unionists it does mention the following and we can see that discrimination was praticsed by Nationialist controlled Councils,and that there was constant violence from republicanism.

Led politically by the Nationalist Party and in violence by the IRA, sections of the 'Catholic' minority believed that their rights as individuals could be guaranteed only in an all-Ireland republic. Their political aspirations were articulated with equal ineffectiveness by both protagonists. The IRA carried on campaigns of violence in every decade up to and including the sixties. Each campaign was less effective than the previous one. With the prospect of victory constantly receding, the struggle became an end in itself, a form of sporadic ritual carried over from a period in political history which only Unionist discrimination made relevant. In Stormont the Nationalist Party, the largest parliamentary opposition group, bluntly refused to accept the title of Her Majesty's Official Opposition. They were opposed to the Government, but not officially, and in a consciously unofficial manner they complained about discrimination against Catholics and simultaneously practiced discrimination against Protestants in some Nationalist-controlled councils.

One of those Nationalist controlled Councils was in Newry..

Hennessy,op,cit. In 1958,of the twenty full-time clerical staff working for Newry Urban District Council,all were Catholics; of the seventy outdoor full-time workers all were Catholics; of the 765 houses belonging to the Council,only 22 were occupied by Protestants..
Hope Against History by Jack Holland page 309 (notes)


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
PalmettoPatriotDate: Friday, 2009-12-25, 3:29 AM | Message # 5
Group: Removed
Load ...




How is the immigration from the Republic to Ulster coming these days? Are lots of folks from the south moving up to Ulster? Have a lot of immigrants gone home given the economic crisis? Here, we see less Mexicans these days and immigrants in general I would say. Sadly, the influx of Yankees continues, though at a slower pace than before because they aren't able to see their homes up North. Anyhow, just curious about the demographic movement.

Take it easy, mate.

 
CulzieDate: Saturday, 2009-12-26, 7:28 PM | Message # 6
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
Ach its good to hear from you PP,hope everything went well for you over Christmas.

Hard to say mate. I think the demographics are pretty much the same. There are a lot of people I think who would prefer the situation to stay as it is. The 'hard-heads' who look at the economic side of things, I think can see the benefits of the present system.....the best of both worlds.

For the last lot of months they have been streaming over the border in their thousands to shop in Ulster. The car-parks were full of Eire registered cars. All the stores (especially in the border areas) are reporting huge sales boosted by those crossing into Ulster. So much so that the Eire goverment is kicking up hell about it,appealing to their people to shop in Eire and even threatening some sort of action.

Not so long ago the situation was reversed,though on a smaller scale as people from Ulster went to Eire for cheaper petrol. So a lot of people on both sides would see the benefits of the situation staying as it is. Maybe the old reiver instinct still prevails after all these years. smile

Off out now in a wee while for a few beers. ATB for now mate.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
CulzieDate: Monday, 2010-03-08, 9:22 PM | Message # 7
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
Stormont 1966

The Stormont Papers

UNIVERSITIES Scholarships in Arts and Science at Maynooth College 25th Oct 1966

4. Mr. Currie asked the Minister of Education what has been the result of his discussions with local education authorities concerning grants to students attending St. Patrick's College, Maynooth.
The Minister of Education (Captain Long): As a result of discussions which have taken place I think it likely that all local education authorities will in future adopt a common basis for assessing the value of university scholarships in arts and science held at St. Patrick's College, Maynooth, with a maximum annual value of £225 plus fees.

Mr. Currie: I would thank the Minister for his reply. I can assure him that many of those students who were under severe hardship will be very relieved. Can the Minister now give me an assurance that on all occasions in the future students at Maynooth College will be treated in exactly the same way as students of any other college as regards grants?

Mr. Patrick Gormley: May I, as a member of the Londonderry County Education Authority, congratulate the Minister on the fact that all authorities are coming into line with the practice of that committee of not making any distinction between educational establishments north of the Border and those south of the Border, such as Trinity College, Maynooth and U.C.D.?

5. Mr. O'Reilly asked the Minister of Education whether he will review the present permissive power possessed by local education authorities to make grants towards the cost of school uniforms for necessitous children.
Captain Long: The powers of local education authorities to provide school uniforms for necessitous pupils were clarified in the Education (Amendment) Act 1966. There have been some doubts in the minds of the authorities as to the exercise of their powers in this respect and I propose to discuss the matter with them. After these discussions have taken place I have in mind the issue of a circular giving further guidance on the subject.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
CulzieDate: Monday, 2011-02-07, 12:52 PM | Message # 8
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
From the B.T. Saturday June 7th 1997. 'Gerry Adams Slected Writings' Brandon £8.99 part of a review by Barry White.

Back in the 1960s,Gerry Adams admits that republicans were central to the formation of the civil rights movement,as unionists had always claimed. They packed the first meeting,steering it their way but deliberately allowing only two of their members on to the executive.

They sat back,providing most of the organisation,while more acceptable faces gave a lead. Sounds familar? Exactly the same thing has happened in the residents groups,as RTE revealed in a recent Adams tape,even though they have taken on a life of their own. When you have made up your mind,as commited republicans like Adams have that partition is the root of all evil,the rest is simple.

The irreformable statelet has to be eliminated by one means or another,and the unionists actively persuaded to find another identity

Violence,always excused by reference to MOPE ( the Most Oppressed People in Europe),was one method,but in latter years the combination of politics plus targeted violence has made far more headway. Just as Stormont fell to civil rights,violence and boycotts,Sinn Fein obviously hopes that unionism will succumb,or commit suicide,under pressure from the British and Irish goverments and the IRA.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
RSAUBDate: Monday, 2011-02-07, 9:28 PM | Message # 9
Colonel general
Group: Moderators
Messages: 871
Load ...
Status: Offline
Very interesting, even when Unionists controlled Londonderry corporation (council) the majority of the council workforce was Roman Catholic. The data about Newry is very interesting indeed, I've been looking for a long time of documented proof of discrimination by Rebel controlled councils before the troubles for a long time.
 
CulzieDate: Tuesday, 2011-02-08, 2:59 PM | Message # 10
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
I think there was an understanding between the politicans on both sides..'you don't interfere in our area and we won't interfere in yours' Not an agreement I may add but a nudge/wink thing maybe. There were letters into the BT on a regular basis from irate unionists giving off about Newry Council but the Ulster Unionists did nothing about it.

Professor Rose in his enquires into discrimination in Ulster mentioned that there were other Catholic controlled councils which practised discrimination against Protestants but it never said who these councils were in the book I read. Professor Rose brought out a book 'Governing Without Consenus' shortly after that which dealt with the situation here. It may have mentioned these councils in that book. But even earlier on in this thread I quoted a part from the civil rights book 'We Shall Overcome'in which even they admitted that Nationalist controlled councils discriminated against Protestants.

But we as Protestants/lUnionists failed to get this across,though have to admit nobody was interested in hearing another side to the story. The protest movement thoughout the western world had been the opportunity the ira and others had long waited for and they seized it with open arms. The ground work had been done for them in lands as far away as France,Germany,Australia,America. The world though TV saw what was happening in these countries and so were already prepared to see Ulster as being the same...an oppressed people kept down by an authoritive regime. The civil rights in America especially was the one they modelled themselves on here. Here again the sympathy already gained by MLK was transplanted to here and they had only to mouth the same words and sing the MLK anthem 'we shall overcome' adding that they were the 'white negroes' in Ulster. So really Ulster Protestants were up against it from the word go. The media wasn't even prepared to listen to what we had to say. I think their attitude could be seen in how they described the two peoples.

Protestants were described as 'mobs' and 'thugs'
Catholics were described as 'protesters' and 'demonstrators' Hardly impartial reporting.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
RSAUBDate: Tuesday, 2011-02-08, 10:08 PM | Message # 11
Colonel general
Group: Moderators
Messages: 871
Load ...
Status: Offline
Aye, they jumped on the bandwagon and played on the media bandwagon, which they knew would also win over liberal Prods, who just haven’t the stomach or the back-bone to stand their ground.

I remember watching Eamon McCann saying on tv about a man who pretended in front of a TV camera of one of the most famous images of the troubles of a RUC man striking a Civil Rights member with a baton and the man said God Save Us, that image was shown throughout the world, but totally stage managed for the television cameras. It happened in Londonderry, what got me about McCann was he was laughing about, that incident was probably one of the images that helped fuel the fire of flames for the troubles in Ulster.

It proves again the traitors from within our own community, lundys like Ivan Cooper etc deserve to pay a heavy price for their treacherous behaviour.

What didn’t help our cause was Ian Paisley. He was a republican dream, if ever you wanted a man who would come across as an uncompromising sectarian bigot to the media, off-course he was mainly full of hot air but to a world audience unacquainted to Ulster, he epitomised everything the enemies of Ulster had been saying in propaganda terms against the Unionists of Ulster, regardless of the facts.

Fire and brimstone political talk and chants of No Surrender, go down well with Ulster prods, wither they lack substance or not. Yet, to a world wide audience, it is nothing but bigoted rhetoric

 
CulzieDate: Thursday, 2011-02-10, 8:33 PM | Message # 12
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
Yeah your right, Paisley was a boost to those who made the allegations against Ulster. He didn't care how it would affect Ulster and was only interested in promoting himself. Paisley was, and is, no mug in that respect. Hes a calculating man and his own ego was his main function. There is no doubt in my mind that Paisley would be well read up on men like Roaring Hanna,Drew,Cooke etc etc all men of the cloth who were the predessors of Paisley and who could work the Protestant crowds in the same manner as Paisley would later do. He knew what he was doing and he knew the Protestant psyche.what turned them on. It crossed my mind that Paisley's 'monster rallies' which he advertised in the press on a regular basis reminded me of Hitler and the Numenburg rallies. Thats how it came across to me,but I pushed these thoughts from my mind and tried to listen to what he was actually saying.Most of it was blood and thunder stuff but amid all the bluster he did speak the odd bit of sense.

O'Neill was to blame too for what happened as it was him who took the Unionist Party on an entirely different course without even consulting his own cabinet. HE certainly didn't believe in gradualism. When he sprang the Lemass visit on the people, the people naturally wondered 'what the hell is going on here' and there was a lot of fear and worry. Paisley was the man who came on the scene and spoke what a helluva people were thinking. He was the man who was staying true to the cause. O'Neill was taking them to God knows where....an all Ireland maybe. So Paisley exploited these fears and concerns for his own ends. There was a time when you would have been lynched for saying that but time has proven that to be true. Whatever you say about Paisley you have to admit he was a con artist of the top order. ''You can't fool the people all of the time'' but he certainly did it long enough to get his money and position out of it all. I put my hand up to him in that respect.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
RSAUBDate: Thursday, 2011-02-10, 10:43 PM | Message # 13
Colonel general
Group: Moderators
Messages: 871
Load ...
Status: Offline
I think Paisley is a egotist, more concerned with his own ego than Ulster. I think that has been proven.

Yip O’Neill was a political fool, a man who just couldn’t grasp the fact that many Roman Catholics want to see a United Ireland and at that time, wanted nothing to do with British Ulster. I think he seen it in straight economic terms, rather than from a local level. May be to much time spent in England. I agree with the concept of “if you give a Roman Catholic a decent job, they won’t live of national assistance and have 15 children”. Yes true, if someone is working, rather than scrounging of the state they wouldn’t have as big a families as they wouldn’t be able to afford to keep them, plus they would be contributing to society.

But the difference is, most Roman Catholics in Ulster obviously not all wanted nothing to do with this community and through their church had their own schools, hospitals,GAA erc , and at that time most R.C tended to live in rural areas or the west of the Province areas were there was very little work, at that time most of industrial Ulster was built around Belfast and the greater area which was predominantly Protestant. He just couldn’t grasp that R.C. couldn’t be trusted with the administration and security of this Province.

He also seen the visit of Lemass as just that of another neighbouring Country, rather than the visit of a nation who held a territorial claim over our Country and which was a cold house for Protestants.

I think he suffered from naivety on the situation on the ground in Ulster and the mentality of the Irish.

I think Paisley played it to a tee, he’s done well for himself, he’s set his legacy as a man of hot air and treachery for the people of Ulster who were his most loyal followers. The Ulster prod like the street warriors, boys like Paisley,Bill Craig and Geordie Seawright inspire a wee bit a fire in our belly’s while men like Enoch Powell, James Molyneux might talk sense, but standing in a suit with a shirt and tie, doesn’t inspire the same flames of passions as the political spectaculars like the big rallies, the marches and protests with fire and brimstone talk and the flags fluttering in the background.

 
CulzieDate: Saturday, 2011-02-12, 12:25 PM | Message # 14
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
This was another 'civil rights' leader who was an ira man. Yet we are still expected to believe that it was a spontenous general protest without any ira connections. The press and media of that time have a lot to answer for as their reporting and their bias in that reporting which played a big part in what was to follow. Nearly 4,000 dead. But so what, as long as they got a good story and could walk away afterwards back to their own country and warm beds.

Malachy McGurran
Malachy McGurran (1938 – 27 July 1978) was a leading Irish republican and founding member of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association, of which he was chairman.

A native of Lurgan, County Armagh, McGurran joined Sinn Féin and the Irish Republican Army in 1955. He was interned in the Curragh military barracks, near Dublin, from 1957 to 1959 during the IRA Border Campaign.

A lot of what is going on now in the middle east reminds me of the same in the 1960s which happened in the western world. How it starts off and then spreads to other countries. The people seem to get swept away with emotion generated from country to country sometimes with no real serious greivence but all part of an uprising which is carried along by a wanting to be a part of the action. That too was the mood in the 1960s.

I think I read first of a demonstartion in Algeria,then it was Tunisia,Jordan,Egypt,Yemen and just today I heard on the news that Algeria are staging a protest demonstration. I'm wondering will the Muslim Brotherhood emerge as being the instigators in the background pulling the strings as the ira were here.


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
CulzieDate: Saturday, 2011-02-12, 12:49 PM | Message # 15
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1750
Load ...
Status: Offline
Good point there RSAUB about the Roman Catholics refusing to play their part. The past is littered with examples of this happening, their modus operandi over thos years was to help create a situation...then whinge like hell about their rights. It was all fuel to the fire for them in attacking the state. If elected they refused to take their seats and then proceeded to cry about having no representation. When some of them did finally decide to take their seats at Stormont they whinged that they had only got one Bill passed. McGuinness raised this at some conference he was at the other week which I think was in East Belfast. He said that the only Bill nationalists got passed was the Wild Birds Act. True,but I would like to know how many Bills Labour got passed when the Tories were in goverment or vice-versa. I wonder did any of the Prod 'nodding dogs' at the conference take issue with McGuinness about what he said. I very much doubt it.

Paisley has made a good living for him and his family out of the 'troubles' there is no doubt about that. But there are still people who think hes the greatest. One of the mates I would see on a Saturday night is one of them. I have stopped discussing it with him as things got a bit heated sometimes,especially with a few beers involved. smile I think some of it is a genuine belief but some of it is because they don't want to admit that Paisley 'took them on'. There was a letter in the NL this week by some DUP councillor who was replying to a previous letter by a TUV man. In it he was crowing about how Paisley junior had wiped the floor with Allister. Sad to say he had a point.

As mentioned before, people seem to prefer a man involved in shady deals.. a wheeler-dealer, and reject a man of principle


Ulster Protestants consider themselves to be a separate nation. This nation they call Ulster
 
Search: